Guest Speaker: Harry Surden, Associate Professor of Law, University of Colorado; Affiliated Faculty, CodeX
Location: Stanford Law School
First up was discussing ‘What is AI?’, generally speaking.
AI usually describes using computers to solve problems. The phrase is not universally agreed upon and can mean different things to different people.
A useful definition was given as a basis:
“AI is using technology to solve problems or make automated decisions or predictions for tasks that when people do them are thought to require intelligence. Computers make decisions very differently than people. The end decision is reached via a different journey…”
Harry repeatedly says that ‘we do not have strong AI today’. This was a surprise to me, given the amount of work I have seen expedited with artificially intelligent assistance. Harry went on to explain that lay people think AI means computers that think like people. Strong AI is perpetuated by films where humans converse with robots.
The most advanced available AI cannot think or replicate abstract reasoning. They are not thinking machines. A lot of this perception is due to media exaggeration. Thankfully, we seem a long way from computers taking over the world.
‘A 2-year-old human has better cognitive ability than the most advanced AI today’.
The term AI is a misnomer, given the state of todays’ intelligence. It’s not human-level intelligence and looks nothing like how you would expect it given the media's opinion.
So, what is the AI that we speak of?
Realistically, AI is pattern-based artificial intelligence, AKA ‘Machine Learning’. Examples of this in daily use are in the automation of driving cars and language translation. In limited domains, AI can do great things, including knowledge representation.
“We have to be realistic about AI. We have to understand what it is capable of”
In the words of my previous write-up, it is important to ‘Demystify AI’ in order to manage our own expectations. Law and policy changes will not be made by computers for a long time, if ever.
What are some major AI techniques?
- Computer logic- rules-based approach.
- Logic, Rules and Knowledge- Representation Based AI.
- Modelling real-world processes or systems using logical rules: top-down rules are created for computers which are used to automate processes.
An interesting use of AI was by the company that created ‘TurboTax’. This faithfully represents the laws and meaning of legislation. The programmers, in consultations with lawyers and accountants, examine tax codes and see these rules as computer rules that need to be followed.
Why is this important?
You can now engage in computer deductive reasoning. A process that humans cannot do alone. Computers can process rules in complex chains forming non-obvious conclusions; a skill out of the reach of humans. An example of this is collecting expenses on business trips.
A lot of early AI was formed for these purposes.
Machine Learning, ‘the dominant mode of AI today’…
In the last 20 years, machine learning has become very popular. Algorithms find patterns in data and infer rules on their own. i.e. Netflix recommended films or computers identifying a specific email; as a scam. Netflix- compares you to other humans ‘like you’. The patterns are already there, and the machines must be able to ‘pull it out’ and make it applicable. This requires large amounts of data to predict patterns.
You may not have noticed it given the number of emails we receive and how quickly we read or discard them, but email spam filters have improved drastically. They have evolved and can now distinguish types of spam.
‘We have intelligent results without real intelligence’.
When it comes to what AI systems to use, you don’t have to choose one or the other. Many successful AI systems are hybrid systems. E.g. self-driving cars employ both approaches.
Human intelligence + AI Hybrids
Many successful AI systems work best when they work with human intelligence.
Many AI systems have ‘humans in the loop’ to give them an advantage over other structures.
This system of chess playing is the most superior. The human player is enhanced by the intelligence generated by the computer.
We often talk about AI being fully autonomous, making key decisions on its’ own, eventually resulting in a Terminator-style Armageddon with the machines taking over. The reality is that many AI systems ask humans for help. To make a judgement decision of an abstract conceptualisation. Humans frequently get a self-driving car out of trouble and then give power back to the machine.
‘Enhancing, not replacing’, as per my previous write-ups, is a crucial takeaway from this lecture.
Law and technology have always been linked, going all the way back to Leibniz in the 1600s. Recently speaking, the era of knowledge representation was the 1960s- 80s with legal tech and machine learning being discussed and developed from 2000 to the present.
The lecture then explored AI and its use in law with very interesting areas of discussion. This has prompted me to explore this area in more detail. It makes for fascinating discovery.
